StrategyDriven’s Resource Management forum provides materials focused on the leading practices of companies effectively managing their personnel, intellectual property, equipment, facility, and other assets in support of strategic planning and tactical business execution.
All employees need to feel their work contributes to and is valued by the organization. While leaders may express appreciation for an individual or group’s work effort, resource management programs sometimes unintentionally marginalize employee contributions. Doing so causes employee dissatisfaction, burnout, and unwanted attrition. Resource management and strategic planning programs must therefore be carefully constructed so as to not unintentionally marginalize employee effort.
Hi there! Gain access to this article with a StrategyDriven Insights Library – Total Access subscription or buy access to the article itself.
Subscribe to the StrategyDriven Insights Library
Sign-up now for your StrategyDriven Insights Library – Total Access subscription for as low as $15 / month (paid annually).
Nathan Ives is a StrategyDriven Principal and Host of the StrategyDriven Podcast. For over twenty years, he has served as trusted advisor to executives and managers at dozens of Fortune 500 and smaller companies in the areas of management effectiveness, organizational development, and process improvement. To read Nathan’s complete biography, click here.
Frame of reference is everything in business. Different people within the same organization have contrasting views as to the Business They’re Really In.
The term Budgeting gets tossed around in many ways. Budgets get blamed for gridlock. Budgets get politicized.
Budgets get more attention than the umbrellas under which they rightfully belong: Strategic Planning and Visioning.
Budgeting by itself is a minor piece of business strategy. By itself, Budgeting does not constitute full-scope planning and business strategy. Budgeting is a peg in the process.
Questions to follow in Budgeting as part of Strategic Planning and Visioning processes include:
Does this process increase your accountability to funding sources and to the public?
Are budgeting measures used to manage performance?
Is the performance management system focused upon outcomes?
Are the key measures the best representation of progress of the institution?
Can the benchmarking information be accessed regularly?
How well can management interpret and apply findings to the decision process?
Does your strategic plan adequately describe what you do?
Does the strategic plan provide necessary guidance to the activities you will measure?
How diverse is the planning committee?
Do performance measures provide an early warning system for problems?
How do you handle crisis management and preparedness?
Have you prioritized and fully defined key measures and non-key measures?
Have you done scenario planning of measures beyond your immediate control, i.e. external factors which profoundly impact your livelihood?
Do the measures address both internal management and external perceptions and accountabilities?
Performance measures should be included in contracts with all resources, such as adjuncts, vendors, suppliers. Supply chain management should be implemented. Quality management should be implemented.
Adjustments must be periodically made to target markets, definition of terms and modification of strategies.
Organizations start out to be one thing, but they evolve into something else. In their mind, they’re one thing. Other people think they are something else. Priorities change. Dedicated providers of the service stated in the original company mission become frustrated when they don’t understand the reasons for shifting priorities.
Most often, what organizations say they do in external promotions to potential customers actually ranks low on the actual priority list. That occurs due to the agendas of individuals who guide the organization…departing from the core business for which founders were presumably educated and experienced. Add to that the harsh realities of doing business and staying competitive.
Here is an average priority ranking for companies-organizations:
Revenue volume and its rewards (bonuses for key management).
Growth, defined as increasing revenues each year (rather than improving the quality of company operations).
Doing the things necessary to assure revenue (billings, sales, add-on’s, marketing). Keeping the cash register ringing… rather than focusing upon what is being sold, how it is made and the kind of company they need to be.
Running a bureaucracy.
Maintaining the status quo. Keeping things churning. Making adjustments, corrections or improvements only when crises warrant (band-aid surgery).
Glory, gratification and recognition (for the company and for certain leaders).
Furthering stated corporate agendas.
Furthering unwritten corporate agendas.
Courting favor with opinion leaders.
Actually delivering the core business. Making the widget itself. Doing what you started in business to do…what you tell the customers that you do.
Doing the things that a company should do to be a good company. Processes, policies and procedures to make better widgets and a better organization.
Customer service, consideration or follow-up beyond the sale.
Looking after the people, in terms of training, empowerment, resources and rewards.
Giving back to those who support the company.
Advancing conditions in which core business is delivered.
Walking the Talk: ethics, values, quality, vision.
Giving back to the community, industry, Body of Knowledge.
People in the organization who do things below the top nine priorities have vastly different perceptions of the organization, its mission, their role and the parts to be played by others:
Some jockey for position… to make their priority seem to advance higher.
Some keep people on the low rungs in check, assuring that their priorities remain low.
Some become frustrated because others’ priorities are not theirs.
Some build fiefdoms within the organization to solidify their ranking.
Some do their job as well as possible, hoping that others will recognize and reward their contributions.
Some don’t think that they’re noticed and simply occupy space within the organizational structure.
Some try to take advantage of the system.
Some are clueless as to the existence of a system, pecking order, corporate agendas, company vision or other realities.
7 Steps Toward Getting Budgets Accepted More Readily:
Commitment toward strategic planning for your function-department-company.
Know your values.
Refine your values.
Control your values.
Add value via internal services.
Take ownership of your values.
Continue raising the bar on values.
7 Stages in Making a Case for Business Funding:
Link to a strategic business objective.
Diagnose a competitively disadvantaging problem or an unrealized opportunity for competitive advantage.
Prescribe a more competitively advantaged outcome.
Cost the benefits of the improved cash flows and diagram the improved work flows that contribute to them.
Collaborate with others.
Maintain accountability and communications toward top management.
Contribute to the organization’s Big Picture.
Rules for Budgeting-Planning:
Use indicators and indices wherever they can be used.
Use common indicators where categories are similar, and use special indicators for special jobs.
Let your people participate in devising the indicators.
Make all indicators meaningful, and retest them periodically.
Use past results as only one indicator for the future.
Have a reason for setting all indicators in place.
Indicators are not ends in themselves…only a means of getting where the organization needs to go. Indicators must promote action. Discard those that stifle action.
Base Budgets on Value, Not on Cost
Readily measurable values:
Time and cost of product development-service delivery cycles.
Reject, rework and make-good rates.
Downtime rates and meantime between downtimes.
Meantime between billings and collections.
Product-service movement at business-to-business levels.
Product-service movement at retail levels.
Product-service movement in the aftermarket (re-sales, repeat business, referrals, follow-up engagements).
Values in terms of savings:
Time and motion savings.
Inventory costs.
Speed of order entry.
Values in terms of efficiencies:
Meantime between new product introductions.
Forecast accuracy, compared to actual results.
Speed, accuracy and efficiency of project fulfillment.
Productivity gained.
Continuous quality improvement within your own operation.
Values which benefit other aspects of the company operation:
Quality improved on behalf of the overall organization.
Creative new ideas generated.
Empowerment of employees and colleagues to do better jobs.
Information learned.
Applications of your work toward other departments’ objectives.
Satisfaction in your service elevated.
Voiced-written confidence, recognition, referrals, endorsements, etc.
Capabilities enhanced to work within the total organization.
Reflections upon the organization’s Big Picture.
Contributions toward the organization’s Big Picture (corporate vision).
About the Author
Hank Moore has advised 5,000+ client organizations worldwide (including 100 of the Fortune 500, public sector agencies, small businesses and non-profit organizations). He has advised two U.S. Presidents and spoke at five Economic Summits. He guides companies through growth strategies, visioning, strategic planning, executive leadership development, Futurism and Big Picture issues which profoundly affect the business climate. He conducts company evaluations, creates the big ideas and anchors the enterprise to its next tier. The Business Tree™ is his trademarked approach to growing, strengthening and evolving business, while mastering change. To read Hank’s complete biography, click here.
https://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/HankMoore2.jpg333290StrategyDrivenhttps://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/SDELogo5-300x70-300x70.pngStrategyDriven2012-11-02 06:24:092016-05-13 15:37:50The Big Picture of Business: Putting Budgeting Into Perspective, The Bigger Picture of Strategic Planning
All organizations are resource limited and it is this limitation that forces executives and managers to become effective at prioritizing the deployment of company assets or risk marketplace failure. This reality places effective resource management at the heart of what it means to be a StrategyDriven organization – the deployment of organizational resources for the optimal achievement of mission goals.
Hi there! Gain access to this article with a StrategyDriven Insights Library – Total Access subscription or buy access to the article itself.
Subscribe to the StrategyDriven Insights Library
Sign-up now for your StrategyDriven Insights Library – Total Access subscription for as low as $15 / month (paid annually).
https://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/ResourceManagementValue.jpg282425StrategyDrivenhttps://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/SDELogo5-300x70-300x70.pngStrategyDriven2012-03-20 06:55:392018-10-07 20:05:06Resource Management – Value of Effective Resource Management
Turbulent economic times typically require budgetary constraint and even cutbacks. As business slows and revenues decline, executives demand managers reduce spending and increase production efficiency. Waste cannot be tolerated and must be rooted out.
Hi there! This article is available to StrategyDriven Personal Business Advisor Remote Access and Dedicated Advisor clients and those who subscribe to one of the article's
related categories.
If you're already a Remote Access or Dedicated Advisor client or a related category subscriber, please log in to read this article.
Not a client? We'd love to have you on board. Check out our StrategyDriven Personal
Business Advisor service options.
https://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/BudgetCuts.jpg282425StrategyDrivenhttps://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/SDELogo5-300x70-300x70.pngStrategyDriven2012-02-21 06:19:032018-06-02 20:42:41Budget Management Warning Flag 1 – Across the Board Cuts
We’ve brought in a number of high priced consultants to perform a business case analysis. In hind sight, it appears we could have done the same work with internal resources. Why then did we hire these costly advisors?
StrategyDriven Response:
There are many reasons for hiring consultants. One or more of these likely applied in your situation:
The consultants brought unique insights and experiences from outside your organization; enabling them to develop and present points of view that would otherwise have not been available for consideration.
The organization staff did not have the capacity to perform the given task. Therefore, the consultants were hired to augment the labor pool.
The existing staff had the capacity but not the knowledge and skills to perform the work. (Note that this appears to not be a factor given the question asked but is a legitimate reason for hiring consultants.)
The organization is reluctant to implement the recommendations made by those internal resources not viewed as being experts in a particular area. Subsequently, the consultants are brought in because of their ‘expert status’ that leaders know will enable them to move forward with a desired course of action.
The reason for engaging consultants should always be understood prior to hiring them. Clear, quantifiable expectations should be documented within the statement of work that define the value they are to bring to the organization whether that is external knowledge and experience, labor augmentation, skills augmentation, or to drive a particular perspective. The consultants must be held to the achievement of these established goals in order to ensure they have met the return on investment promised by their employment.
Final Thought…
Using consultants should always be on a temporary basis. Some organizations fall prey to hiring consultants for temporary staff augmentation only to find that these individuals remain in position for years if not decades. Such circumstances highlight an understaffing condition that should be alleviated by the typically less expensive option of hiring additional resources rather than engaging costly consultants for extended periods.
Additional Resources
StrategyDriven Contributors further highlight the benefits of using consultants in the article, Independent Assessors.
https://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/Consultants.jpg282425StrategyDrivenhttps://www.strategydriven.com/wp-content/uploads/SDELogo5-300x70-300x70.pngStrategyDriven2011-10-24 06:30:532016-05-13 16:02:33The Advisor’s Corner – When Should Consultants Be Used?